Skip to main content
Graduate Education and Life

THE 3MT COMPETITION

Calling all graduate research students! Are you up for the challenge?  The Three Minute Thesis (3MT®) is an academic research communication competition developed by The University of Queensland (UQ), Australia.

  • Present your research topic and its significance in three minutes, using just one slide.
  • Test your academic, presentation, and research communication skills.
  • Succinctly communicate your research to a wide variety of audiences, both academic and non-academic.

2026 3MT Finalists

Sneha Haridas

Sneha Haridas

The hidden workforce of our pastures: Understanding dung beetle communities and rearing native species for West Virginia

Advisors: Dr. Elizabeth Rowen, Dr. Yong Lak-Park

Dionysios Patriarcheas

Dionysios Patriarcheas

Using yeast to study the effects of glyphosate on mitochondrial function

Advisor: Dr. Jennifer Gallagher

Tim Faerber

Timothy Faerber

How Massive Stars Reshape Their Cosmic Neighborhoods

Advisor: Dr. Loren Anderson

Kalyani Bhopi

Kalyani Bhopi

Digital Calibration Source for 21 cm cosmology telescopes

Advisor: Dr. Kevin Bandura

Daniel Duque Urrego

Daniel Duque Urrego

Quantifying Eye Drop Instillation Success Through Wearable Sensing of Bottle Motion, Upper Body Kinematics, and Squeeze Force

Advisor: Dr. Stephen Cain

Chelsea Bihlmeyer

Chelsea Bihlmeyer

Adult Sexual Grooming: A computational explication and testing of user-generated narratives

Advisor: Dr. Lindsay Morris-Neuberger

Ezekiel Irewole 

Ezekiel Irewole

Improving Cognition in Estrogen-Deficient Conditions: The Role of Phytoestrogen

Advisor: Dr. Bernard Schreurs

Khrystyna Pelchar

Khrystyna Pelchar

Efficiency vs Reliability: The Case of Ukraine

Advisor: Dr. Erik Herron

Olivia Harvey

Olivia Harvey

Same Data, Different Conclusions: How Rules Shape Accuracy

Advisor: Dr. Claire St. Peter

Wycliffe Tugume

Wycliffe Tugume

Modification of Biochar for the recovery of Rare Earth Elements from Acid Mine Drainage

Advisor: Dr. Deniz Talan

Our Judges

Taylor Brown, Fellow, PhD student, pfe-Span Development

Damien Clement, PhD, Associate Dean, WVU Honors College, Profess of Sport Exercise and Performance Psychology

Shauna Johnson, Executive Director, WVU Strategic Communications and Marketing

Cinthia Pacheco, PhD, Director, WVU Office of Undergraduate Research

Kate Staples, PhD, Associate Professor and Chair, WVU History Department

Information Sessions

Students interested in entering the 3MT Competition are invited to attend an information session for general guidance on what to expect throughout the competition, eligibility, and how to craft a competitive entry.

Friday, December 12
Noon | Zoom

Thursday, January 15
4 p.m. | Zoom

Register

WHY ENTER?

Get out of your comfort zone, rise to the challenge, and gain valuable experience that will help you grow personally and professionally.

  • Master the skill of concisely pitching your academic research to get a leg up on job interviews, networking, and presenting to venture capitalists or grant funding agencies.
  • Enhance your online reputation, CV, and resume.
  • Win prize money!
About the 3MT International Organization

WHAT TO EXPECT: 3MT TIMELINE

Submit your entry to the competition by Sunday, Feb. 8 at 11:59 pm. The video should cover:

  • What are you researching?
  • Why are you researching this topic?
  • What are the values or outcomes of your research?

Your video will be reviewed by at least three judges.

The 3MT Steering Committee will select the finalists who will compete in the Grand Finale on Tuesday, Apr. 7 at 6:00 p.m. in the Mountainlair Ballrooms. The finalists will be announced by early March and will receive coaching prior to the Grand Finale.

This competition abides by the international 3MT rules and judging criteria, and uses the 3MT Competition Judging Rubric.

2026 STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS

  • Dr. Trisha Phillips, Associate Professor, Political Science, Eberly College of Arts and Sciences
  • Dr. Michael Strager, Professor, Resource Economics and Management, School of Natural Resources, Davis College of Agriculture and Natural Resources
  • Joe Andria, Director, Health Sciences Center Graduate Student Affairs
  • Dillon Muhly-Alexander, Swiger Fellow, graduate student
  • Micalyn Stump, Program Director for Graduate Affairs, Office of Graduate Education and Life

GRAND FINALE PRIZES

Prizes are awarded as “cash prizes” and disbursed in check form without any obligation for future work or service.

first place

First Place

$1,000

second place

Second Place

$750

third place

Third Place

$500

star medal

People’s Choice

$250

medal icon

All Other Grand Finale Finalists

$100

*The IRS may consider these prizes "taxable income." Audience members who attend the final competition will be invited to cast a single vote to select the candidate who they believe best communicated their area of research to the audience. If the People’s Choice Award is also a grand finale winner, the cash prize will be added to their corresponding prize.

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • You must be enrolled in a doctoral program for a minimum of 1 credit hour and have completed enough dissertation work to present some preliminary results by the submission deadline. By the same deadline, make sure that your adviser has completed the Advisor Agreement Form acknowledging the aforementioned statement and that the presentation consists of original research conducted by the student and not the work of the research team.
  • You must be available on the designated competition date to participate in the finale if selected as a finalist. The grand finale will be held Tuesday, April 7, 2026 at 6 p.m.
  • You must be in good academic standing within your program.
  • You must obtain permission from your academic adviser or committee chair to enter the 3MT competition.
  • You must obtain permission from any research collaborators if the research you plan to present incorporates the ideas or work of others.
  • Your presentation should take into account intellectual property issues. (If research content is embargoed or sensitive, the presentation will need to be structured to avoid compromising any future research or any other sensitive information).
  • All final presentations will be open to the public and published online.
  • By entering the contest, you must agree to allow the Office of Graduate Education and Life to use photographs and/or video from the competition in publicity surrounding the contest and/or in other contexts, such as websites, promotional materials, etc.

3MT GRAND FINALE COMPETITION RULES

A single, static PowerPoint slide is permitted. No slide transitions, animations, or movements of any kind are allowed. The slide is to be on display throughout the presentation.

  • No additional electronic media (e.g., sound and video files) are permitted.
  • No additional props (e.g., costumes, musical instruments, laboratory equipment) are permitted.
  • Presentations are limited to 3 minutes; competitors exceeding 3 minutes are disqualified. 
  • Presentations are to be spoken word (e.g., no poems, raps, or songs).
  • Presentations will begin when a presenter starts their presentation through either movement or speech.

The decision of the judges panel is final.

JUDGING CRITERIA

Judges will rate each presentation in the following categories: 

  1. Comprehension

    • Did the presentation provide an understanding of the background to the research question being addressed and its significance?
    • Did the presentation clearly describe the key results of the research including conclusions and outcomes (or expected outcomes)?
    • Did the presentation follow a clear and logical sequence?

  2. Engagement

    • Did the presentation make the audience want to know more?
    • Was the presenter careful not to over-generalize their research?
    • Did the presenter convey enthusiasm for their research?
    • Did the presenter capture and maintain the audience's attention?

  3. Communication

    • Was the research topic, including key results, significance, and outcomes, communicated in language appropriate to a non-specialist audience?
    • Did the speaker avoid scientific jargon, explain terminology, and provide adequate background information to illustrate points?
    • Did the speaker have sufficient stage presence, eye contact, and vocal range; maintain a steady pace; and have a confident stance?
    • Did the presenter spend adequate time on each element of the presentation - or did they elaborate too long on one aspect or rush the presentation?
    • Did the PowerPoint slide enhance the presentation - was it clear, legible, and concise?

2025 3MT Finalists

Read More
SERHII BAHDASARIANTS

SERHII BAHDASARIANTS

First Place

Pathophysiology, Rehabilitation and Performance

School of Medicine

Read More
REVOR SMITH

Trevor Smith

Second Place

Mechanical Engineering

Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources

Read More
Thatcher Stevens

THATCHER STEVENS

Third Place

Chemical Engineering

Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources

Read More
Siti Suwanda

SITI SUWANDA

People’s Choice

Marketing

John Chambers College of Business and Economics

Read More
Anna Korol

ANNA KOROL

Neuroscience

School of Medicine

Read More
Rachel Lee

RACHEL LEE

Neuroscience

School of Medicine

Read More
Sultan Mahmud photo

SULTAN MAHMUD

Chemistry

Eberly College of Arts and Sciences

Read More
April McGinnis

APRIL MCGINNIS

English

Eberly College of Arts and Sciences

Read More
Sahabeddin Rifai

SAHABEDDIN RIFAI

Civil Engineering

Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources

Read More
Deepanjali Roy

DEEPANJALI ROY

Chemical Engineering

Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources

Read More